<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:dtvmedia="http://participatoryculture.org/RSSModules/dtv/1.0"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>DougMurren.com</title>
	<link>http://www.dougmurren.com</link>
	<description>Thoughts from the pen of Doug Murren</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 20:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
		<!-- podcast_generator="podPress/6.8" -->
		<copyright>&#xA9; 2003-2006</copyright>
		<managingEditor>dmurren@square1.org ()</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>dmurren@square1.org</webMaster>
		<category></category>
		<itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Thoughts from the pen of Doug Murren</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author></itunes:author>
		<itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture"/>
		<itunes:owner>
			<itunes:name></itunes:name>
			<itunes:email>dmurren@square1.org</itunes:email>
		</itunes:owner>
		<itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:image href="http://www.dougmurren.com/wp-content/plugins/podpress/images/powered_by_podpress_large.jpg" />
		
		<item>
		<title>Prayer in the 21st Century</title>
		<link>http://www.dougmurren.com/2008/08/19/prayer-in-the-21st-century/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dougmurren.com/2008/08/19/prayer-in-the-21st-century/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 20:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Murren</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Spirituality</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dougmurren.com/2008/08/19/prayer-in-the-21st-century/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a lot more talk about prayer in our day than there is praying going on.  Prayer is the foundation of all that happens on earth.   Jesus called us to pray in such a way that we would remember &#8220;your Father knows what you need before you ask him.&#8221; (Matt. 6:8)
This [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a lot more talk about prayer in our day than there is praying going on.  Prayer is the foundation of all that happens on earth.   Jesus called us to pray in such a way that we would remember &ldquo;your Father knows what you need before you ask him.&rdquo; (Matt. 6:8)</p>
<p>This call is to remind us that prayer is the way we build our world along with the Father. </p>
<p>Prayer is our act of partnership with God. He has in his mystery left the making of a life to the realm of joining with him in a process that brings heaven together with the events of our world.   </p>
<p>In his prayer called the Lord&rsquo;s Prayer two points have stood out to me this week: </p>
<p>Matt 6:12 &ndash; Forgive us our debts as we forgive our debtors. </p>
<p>Matt 6:13  - And lead us not into temptation but deliver us from the one. </p>
<p>Our debts here mean those things we have left undone.  Part of life-building prayer is seeking healing from the damage that only going part of the way to God can bring.  There are several words for misconduct in the scriptures that we all need to watch for: </p>
<p>1. harmatia &ndash; to miss the mark<br />
2. parabasis  - stepping across<br />
3. paratonma &ndash; slipping across<br />
4. anomia &ndash; lawlessness.<br />
5. opheilema  - debt</p>
<p>Prayer reconnects us at all points here. It brings us back. It puts us back into focus.  And it brings order back into our life.   Prayer is the rebuilder.   Prayer is the first step everyone takes on his or her way toward Jesus. </p>
<p>I have also been thinking about postures in prayer.  There are at least six different positions the scriptures attach to praying.  They each emphasize a different attitude in prayer. </p>
<p>Joined Hands &#8212; the position of quiet devotional confidence in the interested God we   worship. </p>
<p>Kneeling   - the act of surrender.  I kneel to the sovereign God making my request. </p>
<p>Walking  - I like to walk and pray.  Walking and praying suggests warfare.  Prayer in active motion. </p>
<p>Bowing  - the act of submission in prayer.  It suggests the position of hearing in Prayer. </p>
<p>Hands uplifted  &#8212; this signifies exulted joy that the answer is assured.  </p>
<p>Prostrate  - the call for extraordinary mercy.  It means I am unworthy but I make my appeal. </p>
<p>These are, as always, challenging times.  It is easy to leave the fundamentals of world changing and turn complex.   It can be easier to write a blog about facing changing trends.  But I hope that today you will take a look at these brief musings on prayer and deploy the strongest weapons we have.   I am persuaded that my prayer for the upcoming elections will be more effective than my vote. And of course I am voting.  But our world needs us to take all the postures of prayer and return things back to the state of His original world.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dougmurren.com/2008/08/19/prayer-in-the-21st-century/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who should we marry?</title>
		<link>http://www.dougmurren.com/2008/08/08/who-should-we-marry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dougmurren.com/2008/08/08/who-should-we-marry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 14:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Murren</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Culture</category>

		<category>Evangelism</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dougmurren.com/2008/08/08/who-should-we-marry/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I read in the Church Report that Tony Campolo feels the state should limit itself just to &#8220;legal unions&#8221; and the church oversee sacred weddings. I think he is right.  And in essence that is what is already happening.  The rate of couples living together outside marriage is staggering when compared to a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read in the Church Report that Tony Campolo feels the state should limit itself just to &ldquo;legal unions&rdquo; and the church oversee sacred weddings. I think he is right.  And in essence that is what is already happening.  The rate of couples living together outside marriage is staggering when compared to a few years ago.  And cohabitation doesn&rsquo;t protect one from the legal implications of marriage as it is thought to.   </p>
<p>Things are different now but not so different from the 1930s. For example a larger portion of the marrying-age population is single today than in the 1950s but in 1940 the proportion of the population that was single was 30 per cent higher than in 1988.   Today&rsquo;s fertility rates are much lower than in the 1950s, the high point of fertility in the 20th century, but much higher than the 1930s low point. </p>
<p>So we aren&rsquo;t as different from our past as we might think.  But on the other hand we are vastly different.  The American dream seems to have been anchored in the 1950s experience.   </p>
<p>I think Campolo&rsquo;s point is that the Church really ought to be about its task. We are after all presented as a sub-culture in the scriptures.  A prophetic voice called to stand as a sub-cultural, nonetheless.  Our standard must exceed those of the culture in general &ndash; &ldquo;the world.&rdquo; </p>
<p>We clearly aren&rsquo;t doing the job of advancing our sacred call.  Eighty-five percent of our kids never return to church after age 18 and 60 to 70% of our kids lose their faith after leaving high school.  What&rsquo;s up with that?  Conversion rates in the U.S. don&rsquo;t even keep up with biological growth any longer.   </p>
<p>I think its time we stop trying to get the culture at large to behave Christian-like and be a powerful sub-culture with world-changing power.  Does this mean we don&rsquo;t contend for our positions? No not at all.  But it does mean we had better be careful that our evangelism quotient isn&rsquo;t drained by efforts we were only secondarily to be concerned with. </p>
<p>Converted people behave like Christ.  The unconverted never will.   </p>
<p>We know next to nothing about effective evangelism today.  Only six percent of the church population even possesses the capacity to share their faith.  And most of the time we fail to serve while evangelizing, opting for persuasion over loving conviction.   </p>
<p>I say let&#8217;s marry the church&rsquo;s folks and stop being the stop for a legal union.  Let&rsquo;s reduce the confusion over what our purpose is and whom we are called to reach.  Let&#8217;s wed our own and reach the rest. </p>
<p>Just a note before I wind up here.  We need many new churches in the U.S.  We need churches with a new start.  We need church plants by the truckload.  I am working with a project in Virginia whose aim is to start 300 churches over six years.  We want to start churches based on home groups, conventional church development and multi-site models.  We need valiant personnel.  If you are interested email me at dbraveheart@earthlink.net. </p>
<p>I am persuaded that our rate of starting new churches aimed at new target groups is vital for the future of the church.  Churches that can do evangelism with great ease are needed.</p>
<p>Churches that are in a position of having to be part of the sub-culture are needed now more than ever.  Why? Historically new churches and movements have reached more people in the past and it is the case now. </p>
<p>I have started five churches.  Three of them failed miserably.  But I am glad I tried.  When you start a church you are never the first stop for most people&rsquo;s church needs.  You are a sub-culture. One church plant I stared grew to an aggregate of 800 people, one a couple hundred, the others under thirty.  But failure and success both have their sweet smell. </p>
<p>We need to get the call to our best and brightest as we once did.  And the best and brightest must see us as a force to change the culture at large.  Not to try and get someone else&rsquo;s world together before we have our own in shape. </p>
<p>So I am comfortable with Campolo&rsquo;s message though still processing its implications.  Especially if it is a call to be a transforming force from the sub-culture of power rather than trying to get the unconverted to behave like Christians.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dougmurren.com/2008/08/08/who-should-we-marry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Growing up on Easy Street</title>
		<link>http://www.dougmurren.com/2008/08/04/growing-up-on-easy-street/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dougmurren.com/2008/08/04/growing-up-on-easy-street/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 02:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Murren</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Deep Thoughts</category>

		<category>Culture</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dougmurren.com/2008/08/04/growing-up-on-easy-street/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I grew up on Easy Street. It wasn&#8217;t a metaphorical experience but an actual street. It was a street that had formerly been the main highway outside town. It became a residential street when Eisenhower&#8217;s highway system replaced the old concrete highway. I loved living on Easy Street. I didn&#8217;t know the meaning of living [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I grew up on Easy Street. It wasn&rsquo;t a metaphorical experience but an actual street. It was a street that had formerly been the main highway outside town. It became a residential street when Eisenhower&rsquo;s highway system replaced the old concrete highway. I loved living on Easy Street. I didn&rsquo;t know the meaning of living on Easy Street at the time. There was a large gravel dune behind our house. And rolling down the 40 or 60-foot high mound was great fun. I would have worried myself sick if my kids were playing on this mound that could slide upon you at any moment. But back then parents didn&rsquo;t worry about as much as we do now. </p>
<p>I have lived on many different streets since Easy Street. I have lived at 220th Pl. And there was Magnolia Way. This road sounds nice but it was a dive area I lived in while attending college. I lived on 15th Pl. for a while. And there was also 124th St. Now I live on E. Satterfield. It&rsquo;s a pretty new address. You can&rsquo;t even get it on Mapquest. In fact if you go to Google Earth it just shows an open field where my house is located. My favorite address was Lowe St. We lived in a cute little house there. Our children went through their kindergarten years there. We were poor, over worked and stressed but happy. </p>
<p>A doctor friend of mine moved his offices to a high tower building right downtown. His move meant he could charge more per patient. None of my moves have allowed me to charge. And usually they cost me more. Changing your address can cost you greatly sometimes. But then again a good change of address can allow for a new start that is very needed. </p>
<p>I almost moved to Nashville a few years ago. I am glad I didn&rsquo;t. But it was a nice place and would have made a fine address change, I think. The price of everything was so much less than where I live. It would have cost me a great deal less. And the music would have been worth it as well. There is a lot of music in Nashville, as you know. The culture seemed to have a great deal more politics about it than the West Coast where I live. I didn&rsquo;t move because I decided I liked my address where I lived already. And I don&rsquo;t like moving that much. </p>
<p>I know many people who need to change their spiritual address. They need to let themselves find an address that works for them instead of against them. Sometimes people clamor to live on Easy Street. There really is an Easy Street out there. It is just a hard address to maintain. Some have chosen to live on Hard Street. You just need to move every once in awhile inside. </p>
<p>One of the best parts of moving is unexpected. I moved ten hours from my home of 33 years last year. The move was a good one. But we discovered quickly we had collected a lot of junk along the way. I threw away or gave away about 1/3 of my personal library. </p>
<p>I had collected, one book at a time, about 30 good-sized boxes of books that I&rsquo;d never read again. Thirty boxes of books is a lot of stuff to carry 800 miles just to not be used. We also gave away about 1/2 our furniture. We had downsized our living space enough that entire rooms full of furniture had to go. </p>
<p>The state of the economy right now is causing many to look at some accumulated obligations and dump them. There can be significant dead wood that builds up investment-wise in over-priced real estate and other things. It can be a good experience. It can for sure be a painful one too. </p>
<p>Your spiritual house could need some cleaning. Attitudes collect, as do resentments, that have to be unloaded when you arrive at a new address spiritually. Attitudes and anger can begin to feel like home. Tragically they are some folk&rsquo;s home. I encourage you to think about a move. It might be time to move from Resentment Street to Joy Ave.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dougmurren.com/2008/08/04/growing-up-on-easy-street/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Expect the Best</title>
		<link>http://www.dougmurren.com/2008/07/17/expect-the-best/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dougmurren.com/2008/07/17/expect-the-best/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 17:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Murren</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Culture</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dougmurren.com/2008/07/17/expect-the-best/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The London Times ran an article on a visit to England by Neil Young.  He has a new movie coming out titled the Freedom of Speech Tour with Crosby, Stills and Nash.  Besides aspirations for his music that lies ahead he is developing a battery-operated car. He has taken a 1959 Lincoln and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><input hspace="6" height="248" border="0" align="right" width="200" vspace="6" type="image" src="http://i.realone.com/assets/rn/img/6/8/0/3/9143086-9143088-large.jpg" alt="Neil Young on the Cover of the Rolling Stone" />The London Times ran an article on a visit to England by Neil Young.  He has a new movie coming out titled the Freedom of Speech Tour with Crosby, Stills and Nash.  Besides aspirations for his music that lies ahead he is developing a battery-operated car. He has taken a 1959 Lincoln and converted it into an electric car.  His goal is to be rid of roadside gas stations and replace them with self-generating power sources.  He thinks his car could actually put power back into the house plug rather than deplete it. </p>
<p>Neil Young has always humored me. He is one of those &ldquo;going to change the world guys&rdquo; from my generation.  He plays like someone just dumped some ants down his pants. Kids like him and have for decades.  He looks as heavy as I do now.  He has produced a bit of a paunch and like me has accepted it as part of this era of his life. </p>
<p>He is selling his vintage guitar collection to fund the electric car project.  I once sold 20 of my guitars, some of which were vintage, to finance a new ministry. It&rsquo;s hard to let go of a vintage guitar. You do have to hand it to him that he is taking on the vision by himself and not just talking about it.   He does drive a Hummer run on biofuel.  So when he drives he is just driving up the price of food. </p>
<p>There aren&rsquo;t enough characters like Neil around. The outrageous comes off normal with him.  Imagine taking your neighbor&rsquo;s Lincoln and tearing the engine out of it and loading it with batteries of all sorts. Detroit can&rsquo;t do it but Neil can?  It just may be a guy like Neil who&rsquo;ll save us all. </p>
<p>My mother always said &quot;Believe you can do anything and you may possibly see it happen.&quot; I am an optimist about our present crisis economically and politically.  I can&rsquo;t help it. I honestly think someone is finally going to get serious about another form of energy and travel finally.  Things have a bit to go before things are as bad as they were in 1990.  I remember 1990.  I had just led a congregation in building a multi-million dollar facility and the economy dropped hard. Everyone acted like it was my fault. We had to do cuts to survive.   </p>
<p>I also remember the dot.com hit in 1987; I had friends who lost 100&rsquo;s of thousands of dollars in that drop.  I remember the vacuous look on the congregation&rsquo;s faces that Sunday.  We made it without cuts that time.  But my nerves were rattled. </p>
<p>I am pretty positive about where will end up this time.  I think things are so complex now it&rsquo;s hard to know if what the papers are saying will happen will in fact burst on the scene. Whatever comes eventually things will be better.  Maybe we&rsquo;ll be a lot less greedy for a while now. But then who knows. </p>
<p>I&rsquo;m sticking with Neil. It&rsquo;s not time to give up on your Lincoln.  No, its time to take the engine out of the thing and plug it into your wall socket.  I like that attitude.  Go Neil!!!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dougmurren.com/2008/07/17/expect-the-best/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s What You Leave Out</title>
		<link>http://www.dougmurren.com/2008/07/15/its-what-you-leave-out/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dougmurren.com/2008/07/15/its-what-you-leave-out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 20:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Murren</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Communication</category>

		<category>Christian Living</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dougmurren.com/2008/07/15/its-what-you-leave-out/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good communication has to do as much with what you don&#8217;t say as what you do say. I am a short preacher.  I preach shorter for three reasons.  One, it&#8217;s easy to maintain a strong devotion to our children&#8217;s ministry with shorter services. But our habits are to continue adding more and more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good communication has to do as much with what you don&rsquo;t say as what you do say. I am a short preacher.  I preach shorter for three reasons.  One, it&#8217;s easy to maintain a strong devotion to our children&rsquo;s ministry with shorter services. But our habits are to continue adding more and more features to our programs until we are cluttered and overloaded.  Two, if you get a year&#8217;s worth of words in one week you aren&rsquo;t likely to come back next week.  Third, one good clear point is all people will remember anyway. </p>
<p>I think each of us have a capacity for a set number of words a day.  Some people use up a lot of our words a day. A good communicator leaves people with a bit of a reserve.  Just because I have some space for words in my brain doesn&rsquo;t mean you should take more than your fair share.  Some people have a higher capacity for words than others,  Communicating means hitting the mark in terms of numbers of words your listeners can take. </p>
<p>A good song is whittled down to its simplest essence.  Harry Nilsson had a multi-platinum hit record that only had one cord in it.  I know the guitarist on the record and he said they worked days on the song with only an E cord.  Simple is better.  A bad song is a complex song. Who remembers many songs by Yes?  Ok you don&rsquo;t know who they are.  That proves my point.  I love Yes and have met some of the group.  But their music was more complex than the untrained ear could hear. </p>
<p>Good songwriters know what to take out of a song.  Knowing what to leave in is tough but that exercise is meaningless without the ability to slice and cut.  One guitarist I know who is world class says if he could do a solo with just one note he would love it. &ldquo;Every note you add,&rdquo; he says. &ldquo;You increase the possibility of not being heard.&rdquo; </p>
<p>Now we are in our campaign season.  And we are already getting promise after promise. New ideas and programs are thrust at us daily.  I don&rsquo;t think it takes much imagination to come up with something new to spend money on.  I think the most creative politicians are those who know what to cut out.  What can we live without is the best question?  There is just too much stuff out there. </p>
<p>Quality of life is as much about what you leave out as what you let in.  I made a list of the self-development steps I wanted to make over the next year. My list was long.  I soon realized that to do my self-development projects I would need 80 hours a week. I saw something had to give.  I had to decide what to cut out.  And that is hard work.  I had to find the things that brought the most joy, fulfillment and character development.  My list has been limited to four things now.  And I just might achieve them. </p>
<p>Skillful living requires editing your life to leave out the inexpedient.  My friend Jamie Buckingham (noted writer) said the greatest strength a man possessed was the ability to say no.  He was perpetually over-committed but he had a good idea even though he had trouble living it.  I am looking at my whole life now and trying to discover what needs to go.   I know saving my money requires leaving things out.  Enjoying my relationship with my wife means saying no to competing commitments.  And growing in Christ requires my saying no to many things before I usually get to the yes to Him.   </p>
<p>I have mapped out ten possible things to leave out of your life: </p>
<p>1. Things that wear you out.<br />
2. Things that cost more than you have.<br />
3. Relationships that don&rsquo;t promote health.<br />
4. Late nights and long hours.<br />
5. Hobbies that make you choose over loved ones.<br />
6. Things that confuse you with their complexity.<br />
7. Political speeches.<br />
8. Anything that interrupts your sleep.<br />
9. Bad habits that drain you or your resources.<br />
10.  Things that cost a great deal to keep up.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dougmurren.com/2008/07/15/its-what-you-leave-out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marijuana, a spiritual plague</title>
		<link>http://www.dougmurren.com/2008/07/08/marijuana-a-spiritual-plague/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dougmurren.com/2008/07/08/marijuana-a-spiritual-plague/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 20:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Murren</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Culture</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dougmurren.com/2008/07/08/marijuana-a-spiritual-plague/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marijuana was the 60&#8217;s drug of choice. And in 2008 it still is. Today&#8217;s supply is about 50 times more powerful than the stuff sold in the 60&#8217;s. Therefore the habituation factor is much higher today.  I think we are being too slack as healers and as a society about the drug.  It [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marijuana was the 60&rsquo;s drug of choice. And in 2008 it still is. Today&#8217;s supply is about 50 times more powerful than the stuff sold in the 60&rsquo;s. Therefore the habituation factor is much higher today.  I think we are being too slack as healers and as a society about the drug.  It is in my estimation a plague that is waging war on our spiritual life and is responsible for a great deal of inattention to the gospel. </p>
<p><img hspace="6" height="139" border="0" align="left" width="175" vspace="6" src="http://www.sho.com/site/weeds/season4/images/characters/nancy_botwin.jpg" alt="Weeds Nancy Botwin" />Showtime runs a sitcom called, &ldquo;Weeds.&rdquo;  It is about a widowed housewife who went into the marijuana business to support her family.  It is a funny show if the contents weren&rsquo;t so tragic. The show accurately portrayed business types and professional&rsquo;s predilection for the drug.   &ldquo;Weed&rdquo; is still the drug of choice of professionals. It is for sure not just students on high school and college campuses that are drawing deep breaths from joints.    </p>
<p>The dangerous part about pot is it appears to be so benign. It isn&rsquo;t nearly as benign as many parents today think it is. We now know that longer-term use has been shown to cause occasional schizophrenia-like symptoms.  And still today it remains the gateway drug along with cigarettes into opiates, methamphetamines, cocaine and a range of prescription drugs. Most of the time people will try pot before they experiment with other drugs.  Again I am absolutely persuaded that marijuana is THE most dangerous drug available because of this. </p>
<p>We also know that marijuana effects the area of the brain that enhances ambition. The drug depletes ambition.  It can cause one&#8217;s life to stop as though a pause button was hit.</p>
<p>It is also a proven cause of depression.  It is a depressant and when smoked often it can cause depression-like symptoms to plague the user.  And depression we now know is not so harmless at all. </p>
<p>Habituation is definitely less dangerous than physical addiction. But habituation to marijuana can leave all kinds of emotional damage that isn&rsquo;t easily overcome.  People are more and more finding themselves in the place that they cannot quit using without some outside intervention. </p>
<p>But the most dangerous aspect of the drug&rsquo;s use is it is a counterfeit spiritual experience.  I feel principalities drive it that seek to neutralize the truth with false religious experiences that block out the seeking heart.  I am fully persuaded that an awakening in our culture is being resisted by this plague.  The drug was used by numerous ancient cultures as part of religious rites.  And it still carries religious currents in its use. </p>
<p>When I have shared my panic over the trend toward normalizing pot I get statements like these,   &ldquo;It&#8217;s better than driving drunk.&rdquo;   Or, &ldquo;It&#8217;s not addictive after all.&rdquo;   And, &ldquo;It&#8217;s just good clean recreation.&rdquo;   Heart disease doesn&rsquo;t kill, as quickly as cyanide so which is better.</p>
<p>It may not be addictive but it carries the baggage of an entire worldview.  And the sensation the drug offers comes straight out of the brain&rsquo;s God talk area.  I remember well in my college days smoking pot and pontificating about the cosmic issues of life.  It was a spiritual experience.  I found the Holy Spirit to be a much more profound guide into spiritual things. But for a time the allure of pot was strong. </p>
<p>Pot is mostly evil because it stops the pursuit of God.  It takes away from a culture the quest for spiritual reality.  It weakens the human will even more than alcohol in my opinion.  And most of all it looks so safe. </p>
<p>I think and I am praying that there will be a swing back toward their being a stigma about using the drug.  I am hopeful that trafficking in the drug will not be winked at any more but pursued to the max.  And that drug testing for pot will increase in the marketplace and schools. </p>
<p>I know a young woman who was an avid pot smoker in college who stopped using the drug. She stopped for one reason.  She went to work for a bank that did regular random testing for drug use.  Business could do a big part on our war against drugs (I think we still have one of those) by making drug use incompatible with employment in their firms. </p>
<p>And let me add. I am not a cranky old guy.  Nor am I an alarmist.  Nor am I out of touch with trends.  And neither am I unrealistic about what can be expected.  What I am is an evangelist and I don&rsquo;t like what I am facing fighting this plague.   We can throw down spiritual powers that drive these things out but first we have to stop letting them lull us to sleep.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dougmurren.com/2008/07/08/marijuana-a-spiritual-plague/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Staying in touch with the supernatural &#8212; Angels</title>
		<link>http://www.dougmurren.com/2008/06/27/staying-in-touch-with-the-supernatural-angels/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dougmurren.com/2008/06/27/staying-in-touch-with-the-supernatural-angels/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 17:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Murren</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Christian Living</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dougmurren.com/2008/06/27/staying-in-touch-with-the-supernatural-angels/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes Christianity can become more like empiricism than the supernatural revelation it is.  And it is just as easy to begin to see the presentation of messages as good self-help material.  Does preaching have to be pragmatic? Well, first, I think so, yes.  But it is always more than that.  It [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img vspace="6" hspace="6" border="0" align="right" src="http://tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:Qkw3WbY6GsjY5M:http://img28.picoodle.com/img/img28/8/7/6/f_angels1m_20368b0.jpg" alt="Angels" />Sometimes Christianity can become more like empiricism than the supernatural revelation it is.  And it is just as easy to begin to see the presentation of messages as good self-help material.  Does preaching have to be pragmatic? Well, first, I think so, yes.  But it is always more than that.  It is supernatural. </p>
<p>A church can lose its moorings in the power of miracle if things have to be logical and always make sense.  And on the other hand if everything has to be mystical and not make rational sense you end up with a scary blend of emotion and superstition.  </p>
<p>I have decided I need to revisit the supernatural revelation side of my experience a little more.  I have started my quest by preparing a message on, of all things, angels. You don&rsquo;t get much more other-worldly than angels.  I read Billy Graham&#8217;s book on the title, and I went through most of the 300 references to angels in the Bible. And found a new vision of reality I left out.   I believe angels are part of our present tense walk with God.  I don&rsquo;t understand totally how or it wouldn&rsquo;t be supernatural.  They are, after, all beyond nature. </p>
<p>I feel a bit like I did when I wrote a book on dreams and found out two things.  First over a lifetime a person will have between 100,000 and 120,000 dreams. Joseph had almost two handfuls of dreams that were from God as revelation as best we can tell.   I also found that about 1/3 of all major biblical events were introduced through dreams.  Now I have thought about that one over the years for sure.  I have had two dreams that I think were revelatory.  One of them I had repeatedly for several years.  I was preaching in my church and kept being told I was in the wrong place.  It was almost haunting but not in an evil way.   The day I resigned that church after 19 years the dreams stopped and have never returned.  </p>
<p>I haven&rsquo;t seen my personally assigned angel that I know of yet.  I have had some situations that I was suspicious of some mighty spiritual intervention that was different from the Holy Spirit&rsquo;s moving.  But I don&rsquo;t feel safe enough with you to tell you about them.  I suspect when my time is up and I stand before Jesus one of the ceremonies will be to introduce me to my personal angel.  I will have to apologize. </p>
<p>I am attaching with this brief memo here the outline notes for my message on angels. Enjoy them and take the time to consider that the world just might be far less mundane than we think.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dougmurren.com/on-postmodern-communication/not-alone-in-the-world-angels-message-outline/">Angels Message Outline.</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dougmurren.com/2008/06/27/staying-in-touch-with-the-supernatural-angels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What makes you angry?</title>
		<link>http://www.dougmurren.com/2008/06/23/what-makes-you-angry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dougmurren.com/2008/06/23/what-makes-you-angry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 19:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Murren</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Leadership</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dougmurren.com/2008/06/23/what-makes-you-angry/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Emotional Intelligence has been written about a great deal by Dr. Daniel Goleman. It has become a substantial discussion in leadership. The sobriety prayer best defines emotional Intelligence.  It goes, &#8220;Grant me the courage to change what can be changed, the patience to accept what cannot, and the wisdom to know the difference.&#8221;  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Emotional Intelligence has been written about a great deal by Dr. Daniel Goleman. It has become a substantial discussion in leadership. The sobriety prayer best defines emotional Intelligence.  It goes, &ldquo;Grant me the courage to change what can be changed, the patience to accept what cannot, and the wisdom to know the difference.&rdquo;  I think a lot of religious frustration that makes the church look crazy comes from a lack of praying this prayer and possessing emotional intelligence. </p>
<p>Emotional intelligence is the ability, as Aristotle describes it: </p>
<blockquote><p>&ldquo;To be angry with the right person, to the right degree, at the right time, for the right purpose, and in the right way.&rdquo;
</p></blockquote>
<p>
Jesus, of course, was the perfect model of this kind of anger.  There is an anger that heals both the angry one and the recipient of the anger.  But there is also anger that destroys both. </p>
<p>Every effective leader has one thing that angers them.  For some it&rsquo;s the thought that African children go without a cure for malaria. For many large church pastors it is the thought that their cities would go unreached for Jesus.  And for others it&rsquo;s the thought that a child would grow up in an abusive home.   </p>
<p>What&rsquo;s the core anger that drives your passion and concern?  Most non-leaders aren&rsquo;t angry with much of anything.  Or they are angry about trivial things that make little or no difference.  Some are angry they aren&rsquo;t as popular as another.  Some that they didn&rsquo;t have the chances in childhood that some had. This is wasted anger. </p>
<p>Tell me what makes you angry and I can predict your greatness.  And if I know the level of your anger I can predict your effectiveness.  Some are angry about the right thing but just not angry enough.  Properly nurtured anger becomes ebullient passion. </p>
<p>I encourage new church leaders to discover the anger that will drive their life. I think for Jesus it was the fact that His Father&rsquo;s kingdom was rejected and unheeded.  Paul couldn&rsquo;t stand the thought of Gentiles being left outside the promises of God. </p>
<p>Great leaders learn to healthily feed this question, &ldquo;What is it I can&rsquo;t live with?&rdquo;   Or, &ldquo;What has to change before I will sleep a peaceful night.&rdquo; Life takes energy to succeed.  And not many have enough energy to feed their dreams. The healthy presence of anger unleashes necessary levels of energy to get the job done. </p>
<p>I am beginning my second significant pastoral role.  It is interesting to me that I still have the fire after thirty years to want to see thousands meet Christ and the risk taking passion to see it happen.  It struck me the other day that the same anger that has driven me for several decades still drives me today.  I can&rsquo;t stand the thought that lost people &ndash; not one &ndash; will face life and death without the knowledge of a savior who loves them.  And with that that there must be a church where irreligious people can understand what we mean by all this Jesus stuff.  I am angry about religion that confuses.  And I am angry about lies that lock the human soul in despair. </p>
<p>What makes you angry?  You ought to find that out before you take another step.  The answer to this question could show you the future that lies ahead.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dougmurren.com/2008/06/23/what-makes-you-angry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Evangelism Seminars with Murren and Sjogren</title>
		<link>http://www.dougmurren.com/2008/06/12/new-evangelism-seminars-with-murren-and-sjogren/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dougmurren.com/2008/06/12/new-evangelism-seminars-with-murren-and-sjogren/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 20:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Murren</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Evangelism</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dougmurren.com/2008/06/12/new-evangelism-seminars-with-murren-and-sjogren/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every so often a great idea comes along and a great partnership.  Both have happened to me on more than one occasion.  Steve Sjogren, a noted author and leader and I are teaming up to do seminars in churches titled &#8220;New Evangelism.&#8221;  
It is an intuitive set of four sessions.  The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every so often a great idea comes along and a great partnership.  Both have happened to me on more than one occasion.  <a href="http://servantevangelism.com">Steve Sjogren</a>, a noted author and leader and I are teaming up to do seminars in churches titled &ldquo;New Evangelism.&rdquo;  </p>
<p>It is an intuitive set of four sessions.  The first five we are offering at bargain levels to get a track record and line up some satisfied customers.  If you are interested call me at 206-391-9814.  We are looking to speak to groups of 100 to 300.  No less no more please.  We see the sessions being built around the interest and needs of the group and a minimalist design for the curriculum, but well worth it.  Steve and I have been doing this a long time.  We have presented such material together a few times as well.  We will transform the level of evangelism in your church.  </p>
<p>Call  me or email me at <a href="mailto:dbraveheart@earthlink.net?subject=Seminar">dbraveheart@earthlink.net.</a>  Just note seminar under subject.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dougmurren.com/2008/06/12/new-evangelism-seminars-with-murren-and-sjogren/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Toxicity of Religion</title>
		<link>http://www.dougmurren.com/2008/06/11/the-toxicity-of-religion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dougmurren.com/2008/06/11/the-toxicity-of-religion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 18:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Murren</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Culture</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dougmurren.com/2008/06/11/the-toxicity-of-religion/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Religion is sounding more and more toxic to the generations coming into the mix now.
The desire for something more authentic and organic is strong. Can the church fit into the new schemata? I think so but our demeanor needs to continue to change. 
The Christian population is becoming progressively more irreligious. Or, they are dropping [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Religion is sounding more and more toxic to the generations coming into the mix now.</p>
<p>The desire for something more authentic and organic is strong. Can the church fit into the new schemata? I think so but our demeanor needs to continue to change. </p>
<p>The Christian population is becoming progressively more irreligious. Or, they are dropping out of church all together. The stretch isn&rsquo;t just music anymore. I am seeing signs that this battle front in churches may be losing its teeth. But there is a real desire to become irreligious and it is a stretch. </p>
<p>I think the new pattern of church life that is spontaneous, simple, organic and anti-institutional is the only element growing today at any pace. </p>
<p>Bono in a U2 song  &ldquo;Under the Trash&rdquo; expressed the agony of the new pursuit: </p>
<p>&ldquo;I went looking for spirit and found alcohol; I went looking for soul, and I bought some style; I wanted to meet God but they sold me religion.&rdquo;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dougmurren.com/2008/06/11/the-toxicity-of-religion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
